Young Goodman Brown :: Free Essay Writer

Nathaniel Hawthornes unusual story, Young Goodman Br consume, is a news report that can be analyzed through m any(prenominal) different perspectives. The motive uses mystery and bizarre scenarios that create gaps in the plot, leaving the reader communicate researchs about what the mark of Hawthornes style is. To answer these questions, many readers flak the story with a type of critical analysis, such as authorial intention, historical and biographical criticism, mythological and archetypal criticism, or reader solution criticism. All may apply to this particular story, depending on the reader.Authorial intent criticism is based on the idea that whatever meaning undertake path from the passage is none new(prenominal) than what the author intended it to be. This type of approach may be beneficial or may cause more(prenominal) confusion to some readers. If you were to know what the author intended a accepted complicated passage to mean, it would be much easier to grasp t he meaning of the whole text edition. There is one conundrum related to this approach, however. If the author is not infix or has no notes explaining the intention of a passage, it is impossible to have questions answered. This is the problem that I ran into while reading Hawthornes Young Goodman Brown.The plot to Hawthornes story is filled with mystery, leaving the reader questioning certain scenes and acts. For example, the biggest question that I had for Hawthorne was did he intend for Young Goodman Browns pass in the forest gathering to be a dream or a hallucination, or was it real? Some students question whether or not the dark traveler who was waiting for Brown was the Devil or was an change ego for Brown himself. Unfortunately, these are both intent questions that cannot be answered. close to opposite in character is reader response criticism. This is an approach where the readers interpretation of the text is how it is supposed to be seen. How the reader responds to act ions, conflicts, circumstances, and other gaps left within the story is what makes the plot form. With all(prenominal) different reader, and every different reading, a new plot is formed, and none of these readings are any more correct than the other. It is the methodology and transaction between the reader and the text interpretation that counts, and has nothing to do with the intent of the author. With my questions unanswered about Hawthornes intent, I was forced to use reader response and provide my own interpretation.